Web( See Charanjit Lal Chowdhury v. Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 41). The second requirement for a writ of mandamus is that the opposite party must have a legal duty to be performed.
Supriyo v. Union of India - Wikipedia
WebJudgments. Acts. News WebJul 2, 2024 · In Chiranjit Lal Chaudhari v. UOI the lawsuit provided a proper judgement throwing light on the right of the Central Government. The shareholder fought for his … stake owners meaning
Chiranjit LAL Chowdhuri Vs. THE Union OF India AND OTHE
WebJul 26, 2024 · Espousing the same view, the SCI, in Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. The Union of India (hereinafter “ Chiranjit Lal case ”), propounded the governing principle of equality, i.e. ‘similarly circumstanced shall be treated alike’. WebJan 11, 2014 · On the 7th of April, 1950, the Ordinance was repealed and an Act was passed by the Parliament of India, known as the Sholapur Spinning and Weaving Company (Emergency Provisions)Act which re-enacted almost in identical terms all the provisions of the Ordinance and provided further that all actions taken and orders made under the … WebThe same was upheld in landmark judgements in cases, viz Chiranjit Lal Chowdhury v. The Union of India and Others [14] and The State of Bombay and Another v. F. N. Balsara [15], where the judiciary emphasised that the constitution is designed in such a manner as to protect all the people against legislative discrimination. persada engineering \u0026 contracting